|
Site Administrator Of:
Supporter Of:
|
Legislative Assemblies that condemn magazine articles don’t really impress me.I came home tonight to read that the House of Commons decided to unanimously censure Macleans for its recent story on Quebec. Maybe it’s just me, but I think the House has better things to do with the nation’s business and legislative affairs then pass commentary on a news magazine’s point of view (not that I necessarily agree with Macleans POV, I just think this is a pointless political posturing exercise). 5 comments to Legislative Assemblies that condemn magazine articles don’t really impress me. |
I repeat, When trying to understand Ontario's COVID policy, keep this in mind, Doug Ford is unconsciously betting on order arising out of chaos. I.e. "It will work itself out." Health Minister Elliott acknowledges that it is an issue that anti-Vaxers have a date for when proof of vaccine requirements will be lifted (Jan 17) This is hostile, and downright dishonest politicking in its worst possible form. Thanks Stockwell. The media and the power structure expect me to sit in the back of the bus. I won’t! They will try to paint me as a reckless lunatic in order to lynch me into silence. I will always tell Canadians the truth, & no bully or threats will succeed against us! #canpoli https://t.co/fv23ZgHfu4 In Ottawa, for private property, temporary election signs are allowed 60 days before election day. I am so grateful that Canadians did not choose to put the spineless Erin O’Toole in charge of the country during a pandemic. O'Toole does about-face on vaccine mandate for MPs in Commons, now says decision 'infringes' on their rights https://t.co/fpLb0VeYPt So let me get this straight: Ontario is planning to lift proof of vaccination requirements on January 17th, which means that anti-vaxxers can simply wait it out until January 17th and remain unvaccinated? |
I agree Scott. There have been much worse things in print they could have taken action on an did not.
Scott: you flubbed your chance to double-up on your CanCon on this entry to help keep up your CRTC license; ya shoulda worked in Shania:
“That Don’t Impress Me Much”
I don’t know about that. Macleans gets $2,600,000 dollars of federal money from the Periodical Fund so what it prints just might be the governments business. I find this fact, along with Andrew Coynes widely spread views on government the height of hyocracy. But I guess you are right. Freedom of the press and all that. Hypocracy accepted, I suppose.
Yup.
If they really cared they do something about that $1 million dollars Macleans is getting for their postage.