|
Site Administrator Of:
Supporter Of:
|
The C.R.U.S.H ‘radicals’ are at it again – this time in the Globe & MailThis lovely full-sized ad appeared on Page F4 in the Saturday May 22, 2010 edition of the Globe and Mail, courtesy of the Canadians Rallying To Unseat Stephen Harper group – also known as C.R.U.S.H, also known to the Conservative Party as being “anti-Stephen Harper radicals”, which means apparently anybody who disagrees with Conservative Party propaganda. Here is their latest ad, pointing out the Harper/Conservative Party contradictions:
10 comments to The C.R.U.S.H ‘radicals’ are at it again – this time in the Globe & Mail |
Democratic voters have long been thought of as not caring as much about who is on the Supreme Court as Republicans. RPG's death may have awoken them to the danger that many rights may be curtailed under a conservative dominated "handmaid's tale" type Supreme Court. NEW: Democratic donors have now given more than $46 million to candidates and causes in the hours since Ruth Bader Ginsburg passed away — a breathtaking sum of money in so short a timespan. A Republican pollster just told me that this court fight could motivate young women to turn out this year. "They may not vote for Biden, but they will vote for Ruth." @brianschatz https://t.co/MZvet8IAen feels the Democrats have 4 options. WH aide confirms to NYT there’s no time on Senate calendar for confirmation before election Voters in OH should screenshot this before the Senator deletes it. The Republican-led #Senate is standing firm on the principle that Americans should have a voice in who will be next Supreme Court nominee. |
.
.
.
A. Mary Pynenburg is not on the CRUSH admin team I know for a fact.
.
B. What if Mary Pynenburg was on the CRUSH admin. team? How would that have been a bad thing?
.
Stephen HarperCon: Government of One
♪♪♪
.
.
.
Indeed.. as Mary Pynenburg, a two-time Liberal candidate who runs that
“radical” left wing dog & pony show says..
“There is no conspiracy just a big conservative overreaction and attack on anyone who disagrees.”
The Liberals are still unable to get their supporters to actually trust them with their own money, and most of the leaders still haven’t been able to repay their 4 year old candidate loans, one wonders where the money comes from.
@ridenrain, Boy are you dense. You should pick up some of those pre-school activity books – you are pathetic at “connecting the dots”!
@Pamela Allard, Although we are very happy that Mary Pynenburg is a member of our 3250+ group, she is not nor ever has been part of our organizing committee.
@ridenrain, Well, I guess we know which radio show you listen to, huh? He had it so wrong it was comical. You talk about your weird and wacky conspiracy theories. LOL – I sure hope he doesn’t ever get into any serious investigative journalism.
@ridenrain, delusional as usual eh Ridenrain? You should really stop making your own moonshine…
@ridenrain, There is more truth in this small ad, paid for by dozens of small donations by ordinary Canadians, than in the gazillion partisan Action Plan ads blitzed across the country by this government. The latter has been a disgusting use of taxpayer dollars during difficult economic times to tell us absolutely nothing; gigantic billboards merely to promote this self-aggrandizing government.
When are we going to hear the truth about what these CPC ads have cost taxpayers? When will this government provide the accountability and transparency on which it was elected?
Grassroots? lol.
Astroturf.
@ridenrain, perfect description of Conbots Ridenrain!
I think this add is great because it attacks what the Conservatives think are Stephen Harper’s strengths: democratic accountability and fiscal economics. Had the advertisement attacked Harper on the environment and expanded on health care, it wouldn’t have had as much effect as borderline Conservative voters probably rank the economy high on their priorities–health care and the environment, less so.
I encourage the group to go after Harper’s five priorities from the last election. Make his so-called strengths into weaknesses.